Cases 11 - 20 of 139
Bonner v. Kentucky Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
Charles Bonner
Defendant:
Kentucky Department of Corrections, Cookie Crews, Brad Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rector v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv00356
Petitioner:
Lonnie Henry Rector
Respondent:
TDCJ, Director Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RECTOR v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
as 1:2022cv00269
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MICHAEL RECTOR
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
(PC) Adams v. Wong et al
as 2:2021cv01921
Plaintiff:
Rineson Curtis Adams
Defendant:
Wong, California Medical Facility, Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnett v. Superintendent et al
as 4:2021cv01223
Plaintiff:
Brandon Barnett
Defendant:
Superintendent, Jamle Williams, Unknown McFarland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Wong et al
as 3:2021cv07602
Plaintiff:
Rineson Curtis Adams
Defendant:
Dr. Wong, California Medical Facility, Dr. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bellew v. Marshaik et al
as 4:2021cv00906
Plaintiff:
Garrette Bellew
Defendant:
D. Marshaik, Unknown Dennis, Unknown Crew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wooten v. Hayden, et al
as 21-3065
Defendant / Appellee:
(FNU) PREW, DALE REED, WAYNE RECTOR and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL A. WOOTEN
Rector v. Greenville County Sheriff's Office et al
as 6:2021cv01066
Defendant:
The City of Greer, The State of South Carolina, The County of Greenville and others
Plaintiff:
Seuvarrggio S. Rector
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
English v. Coleman et al
as 5:2021cv00016
Defendant:
Lt. Hammock, Officer Barkeley, Officer Spiers and others
Plaintiff:
James R. English, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
