Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Earnest Woods, II v. Kevin Chappell, et al
as 16-16500
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARNEST CASSELL WOODS, II
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN CHAPPELL, Warden, THE VETERAN ADMINISTRATION, THE BOARD OF PRISON TERMS and others
Burnham v. Roemer et al
as 4:2016cv40066
Plaintiff:
Arthur A Burnham
Defendant:
John J Roemer and Maura Tansley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Chappell et al
as 4:2015cv01291
Plaintiff:
Earnest Cassell Woods, II
Defendant:
Kevin Chappell, Veteran Administration, The, Board of Prison Terms, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Ste. Genevieve County et al
as 1:2015cv00018
Plaintiff:
Joshua Aaron Bell
Defendant:
Ste. Genevieve County, St. Francois County, Jefferson County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Ste. Genevieve County et al
as 1:2014cv00094
Plaintiff:
Joshua Aaron Bell
Defendant:
Ste. Genevieve County, St. Francois County, Michael Bauer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ludke et al v. Baenen et al
as 2:2013cv01009
Plaintiff:
Brian A Maus
Defendant:
Michael Baenen , Sarah Cooper, Peter Ericksen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maus et al v. Baenen et al
as 2:2013cv00868
Plaintiff:
Brian A Maus
Defendant:
Michael Baenen , Sarah Cooper, Pete Erickson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roemer v. Borrelli
as 2:2013cv00653
Plaintiff:
Craig Allen Roemer
Defendant:
Brian Borrelli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roemer v. Arnold
as 2:2013cv00575
Plaintiff:
Craig Allen Roemer
Defendant:
Jamie Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. Crocker et al
as 1:2013cv00015
Plaintiff:
Sean Paul Knight
Defendant:
Janet J. Crocker, Clint G. Willis, Patrick C. Roemer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
