Cases 11 - 20 of 47
MCNAIR v. GOVERNMENT OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2019cv03576
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEE MCNAIR
Defendant:
ROY COOPER, MICHAEL T. WOOD and GOVERNMENT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. Woods et al
as 4:2019cv04212
Plaintiff:
Damien J Ward, III
Defendant:
Roderic T Woods, Stephanie Dorethy and . Hillard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hudson v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 4:2019cv02541
Respondent:
Captain Adewa, Office Board, T. CoIII and others
Petitioner:
Isaac Hudson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Witherspoon v. Harley, Classification et al
as 9:2019cv01935
Plaintiff:
Jarode Jermaine Witherspoon, Jarode J.L. Witherspoon and Jarode Devon Witherspoon
Defendant:
Ms. Harley, Classification, Governor McMaster, Sgt. Big Will and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Charleston County et al
as 2:2017cv01958
Plaintiff:
Clark D Thomas and George K Nichols
Defendant:
Folly Beach, City of, Nathan S Williams, James W Smiley, IV and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Gibbs v. T. Wood, et al
as 17-15938
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH GIBBS
Defendant - Appellee:
T. WOOD, K. ROYAL, D. MELTON and others
Eduardo Hernandez v. T. Woods, et al
as 16-17334
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDUARDO HERNANDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
T. WOODS, Lt., F. VANDERHOOFVAN, R. TUPY and others
Moore v. Corizon Medical Services et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00013
Plaintiff:
Thurmon E. Moore, II
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services , H. Hood , Doctor Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Human et al v. Lowrance et al
as 2:2015cv00072
Plaintiff:
Daniel A. Human
Defendant:
M. Lowrance, T. Wood, James Hurley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Granados v. Andersen et al
as 5:2015cv04628
Plaintiff:
Jorge Granados
Defendant:
Andersen, B. Davis, E. Enos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
