Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Wilson v. Douglas County Correction et al
as 8:2017cv00188
Defendant:
4 Unknown Named Officers, Chidez, Douglas County Correction and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin Leo Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tavera v. Conway et al
as 1:2016cv02732
Plaintiff:
Jesus Ochoa Tavera
Defendant:
R. L. Butch Conway, J. Wilson, Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lahens v. O'Brien et al
as 1:2016cv00095
Plaintiff:
Pierre Lahens
Defendant:
Terry O'Brien, J. Gilley and Six Unknown Named Officers of USP Hazelton Special Task Force
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Michael Wayne Fleming v. Unknown Named Officer et al
as 5:2016cv00684
Defendant:
Juan D. Castillo, Phillip R. Guttierrez, Monya Phillips and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Fleming
Ronald Sutherland v. William Stephens, et al
as 15-20616
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD DAVID SUTHERLAND
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, WARDEN SMITH, WARDEN CARTER and others
Pettis v. Myers et al
as 4:2014cv03070
Plaintiff:
Wilkin O'Neal Pettis
Defendant:
Director Myers, Officer Walker, Monroe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barry v. Connor et al
as 2:2014cv00023
Plaintiff:
Wesley M Barry
Defendant:
NFN Connor, NFN Hamilton, Unknown Named Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barry v. Connor et al
as 7:2014cv00015
Plaintiff:
Wesley M Barry
Defendant:
NFN Connor, NFN Hamilton, Unknown Named Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pruitt v. Bennett et al
as 1:2013cv00632
Plaintiff:
Curtis L Pruitt
Defendant:
Cobb Bennett, M Bevil, E Landry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Steven Perez v. USA, et al
as 13-40659
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN REYNALDO PEREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE, Southern District of Texas, UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICE, Southern District of Texas and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
