Cases 11 - 20 of 72,402
Ronald Austin v. William Boher
as 24-6578
Petitioner:
RONALD DURELLE AUSTIN
Respondent:
WILLIAM BOHER, Warden
Brockman v. Lumpkin
as 24-10523
Plaintiff:
Edward Brockman
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Sharron Wilson, Assistant Prosecutor William Knight and others
Williams v. Unknown Part(y)(ies)
as 1:2024cv00386
Plaintiff:
William Williams
Defendant:
Unknown Part(y)(ies)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRYANT v. SWAIN et al
as 1:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN WALLACE BRYANT
Defendant:
SWAIN, KENNEDY, WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAMILTON v. JESTER et al
as 5:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
STANLEY L HAMILTON
Defendant:
WARDEN TEKETA JESTER, DEPUTY WARDEN NICHOLAS BROWN, LACHAKA MCKENZIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reddick v. County of Onondaga et al
as 9:2024cv00762
Plaintiff:
William H. Reddick, II
Defendant:
County of Onondaga, Onondaga County Justice Center, Sheriff Tobias Shelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruggiero v. Rogers et al
as 9:2024cv00769
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ruggiero
Defendant:
Donald D. Rogers, Mark E. Carrow, Joseph H. Noeth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Millan Morales v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv04830
Petitioner:
William Millan Morales
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Eugene William Hillman v. Warden
as 5:2024cv01175
Petitioner:
Eugene William Hillman
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MORRISON v. WASHINGTON
as 2:2024cv02531
Petitioner:
WILLIAM MORRISON
Respondent:
M WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
