Cases 21 - 30 of 133
SHARP v. BAKER et al
as 1:2022cv00238
Plaintiff:
JASON SHARP
Defendant:
ANGELA BAKER, KEVIN DEW, RICHARD WRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Indiana Department of Correction et al
as 3:2021cv00745
Plaintiff:
Daniel Joe Bradley
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Correction, Galipeau, Robert Carter, Jr and others
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Abbott et al
as 2:2021cv00089
Plaintiff:
Matthew Phillips
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Dade Phelan, Ken Paxton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dews v. USA et al
as 2:2021cv00044
Plaintiff:
Maurice Dews and Maurice T Dews
Defendant:
Gene Beasley, Does Associate Warden, Forrest City; Captain, Forrest City and USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00142
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOCKBEE v. WEXFORD L.L.C. et al
as 2:2021cv00026
Defendant:
WEXFORD L.L.C., ARAMARK L.L.C., KRISTEN DAUSS and others
Plaintiff:
BRANDON MOCKBEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chambers v. Kincade et al
as 2:2021cv00011
Defendant:
T.A. Carroll, Stacy Kincade, Shabaz and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Chambers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEWS v. TICE et al
as 2:2020cv05135
Respondent:
ERIC TICE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
DARRYL (WEST) DEWS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LAUDERDALE-EL v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 2:2020cv00486
Defendant:
KEITH HARTZELL, CORIZON CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIES, SUSAN SMOOTHERY and others
Plaintiff:
LAMONE LAUDERDALE-EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dews v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 4:2020cv01032
Plaintiff:
Maurice Dews
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
