Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 4,537
Lucio v. Warden FCI Texarkana
as 5:2024cv00079
Petitioner: Anthony Herman Lucio
Respondent: Warden FCI Texarkana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lorence Smith, II v. Warden
as 24-6552
Petitioner: LORENCE F. SMITH, II
Respondent: WARDEN, FCI Bennettsville
Pareja v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00078
Petitioner: Roberto Alonso Ruiz Pareja
Defendant: FCI Texarkana Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Charles Jordan v. J. Barves, et al
as 24-2030
Plaintiff: CHARLES JEROME JORDAN
Defendant: J. BARVES, Lieutenant FCI-Schuylkill, J. PUMPHREY, Lieutenant FCI-Schuylkill, LT. BARDO and others
Alan v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2024cv00953
Plaintiff: David P. Alan
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden, FCI Elkton, Warden, FCI Loretto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vernon Robinson v. Warden Fort Dix FCI, et al
as 24-1999
Plaintiff: VERNON ROBINSON
Defendant: WARDEN FORT DIX FCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY LYCOMING COUNTY
Chavez v. Hijar
as 24-50427
Petitioner: Raul Chavez
Respondent: Sandra Hijar, Warden, FCI La Tuna, Federal Bureau of Prisons
Bailey v. Warden, FCI Texarkana
as 5:2024cv00074
Petitioner: James Robert Bailey
Respondent: Warden, FCI Texarkana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
SANTIAGO v. WARDEN FCI LORETTO
as 3:2024cv00120
Petitioner: ALEXANDER JESUS SANTIAGO
Respondent: WARDEN FCI LORETTO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mass v. Warden of FCI Danbury We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv11388
Petitioner: Adrian Mass
Respondent: Warden of FCI Danbury
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?