Cases 21 - 30 of 72,910
Cross v. Plaskey et al
as 2:2024cv00689
Plaintiff:
James Cross
Defendant:
Tracy Plaskey, Amber Moeller, Nicole Schwaller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Celado v. Sorrell et al
as 9:2024cv00734
Plaintiff:
Jeurin Celado
Defendant:
K. Sorrell, Trim, T. Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hulbert v. RNCC Mailroom Personnel et al
as 7:2024cv00359
Plaintiff:
Kyle Allen Hulbert
Defendant:
RNCC Mailroom Personnel, R. Hickman, J. Bateman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
Deonta J. Hicks
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson, David Anderson, Joseph D. Bateman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Sanchez v. Wollet et al
as 1:2024cv00649
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Sanchez
Defendant:
Mary Ann Wollet, Wellpath Provider and Tulare County Sheriff Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JEFFRIS v. VANTLIN
as 2:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
DENNIS J. JEFFRIS
Defendant:
DOUG VANTLIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Skyberg v. Newman et al
as 4:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
Jason Skyberg
Defendant:
Brian J. Newman and Tarrant County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NOBLE v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 2:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. NOBLE
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, DURREGAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Williams
as 3:2024cv00548
Plaintiff:
Derrick DeShun Roberts
Defendant:
J. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Milam et al
as 2:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Brent Tyler Kelly
Defendant:
J. L. Milam, Daniel P. White, A. W. Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
