Cases 21 - 30 of 102
HILL et al v. CLAY COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT et al
as 2:2022cv00032
Plaintiff:
JAMES K. HILL and A. H.
Defendant:
CLAY COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT, CLAY COUNTY PROSECUTOR OFFICE, AUSTIN WALDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. CLAY COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER
as 2:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
JAMES K. HILL
Defendant:
CLAY COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Canela Cifuentes Catalan v. James S. Hill et al
as 5:2022cv00062
Plaintiff:
Canela Cifuentes Catalon
Defendant:
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA acting by and through THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION; a California Public Entity, Warden James S Hill, DOE OFFICER 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jonathan David Highley v. James S. Hill
as 2:2021cv07252
Petitioner:
Jonathan David Highley
Respondent:
James S. Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lowery et al v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2021cv03107
Defendant:
Todd Thomason, James Colgan, (fnu) (lnu) and others
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Wallingford, Ramaun Johnson, John E. Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OWENS v. DOE et al
as 2:2021cv02243
Defendant:
JANE DOE, C. REID, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN OWENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guillermo Garcia v. James S. Hill
as 2:2021cv01911
Respondent:
James S. Hill
Petitioner:
Guillermo Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hill v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2021cv00240
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
James Edward Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hill v. Arbogast et al
as 3:2020cv00722
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Correction and Rehabilitation, Captain Arbogast and West Virginia Division of Corrections
Plaintiff:
James M. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Lee et al
as 5:2019ct03295
Defendant:
Julius Hayes, Ernest Lee, Clarence Pickett, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
James Allen Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
