Cases 21 - 30 of 99
Wingate v. City of New York
as 22-1668
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Blake Wingate
Defendant / Appellee:
City of New York, Correction Officer Wallace, No. 14135, Correction Officer Hall, Badge # 13815, R.N.D.C. Mailroom and others
Defendant:
Correction Officer Smith, A.M.K.C. Mail Room
David Meyers v. Regina Hampton
as 22-6831
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
DHO REGINA HAMPTON, MS. NEALLY, Sergeant, MR. COVINGTON, Captain and others
Kennedy v. Hughes et al
as 2:2022cv01867
Plaintiff:
Jamar Kennedy
Defendant:
Sheldon Hughes, Cpt. Sumter, Lt. Julius and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kennedy v. Hughes et al
as 4:2022cv01867
Plaintiff:
Jamar Kennedy and Jamar A. Kennedy
Defendant:
Sheldon Hughes, Cpt. Sumter, Lt. Julius and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MEYERS v. HAMPTON et al
as 1:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
DHO REGINA HAMPTON, SGT. MS. NEALLY, CAPTAIN MR. COVINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-6110
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
David Meyers v. A. Robinson
as 21-6688
Defendant / Appellee:
WAUMMADI, MICHELLE WALKER, Counselor, A. BROWN, Intel Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Chapman v. Henderson County Detention Center et al
as 4:2021cv00002
Defendant:
Amy Brady, Mail Clerk Officer Hunt, Officer Vowels and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Wayne Chapman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alford v. Hodle et al
as 1:2020cv01427
Defendant:
Garry Hodle, Monroe County Jail, Mail Clerk and others
Plaintiff:
Craig Alford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Bruno v. Centinela State Prison Mail Clerk et al
as 1:2020cv00802
Defendant:
California Men's Colony Mail Clerk and Centinela State Prison Mail Clerk
Plaintiff:
Wendell Bruno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
