Cases 21 - 30 of 798
Sanford (PS) v. Denver Sheriff Department et al
as 1:2024cv00399
Plaintiff:
Marquis Sanford
Defendant:
Denver Sheriff Department, Diggins, Denver Sheriff Emergency Health Care Unit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Butler v. Kings County et al
as 1:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
London Marquis Butler
Defendant:
Kings County, Kathy Ciuffini and Valerie R. Chrissakis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. D.O.C. et al
as 3:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Victor L. Jordan, Sr.
Defendant:
D.O.C., Jennifer Reis, Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEWTON v. MOORE et al
as 3:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
MARQUIES NEWTON
Defendant:
SHERIFF MICHAEL MOORE, SGT KELLY and OFFICER CHILDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clardy v. Clark
as 2:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
MarQui Clardy, Sr.
Defendant:
Valarie Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clardy v. The GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
MarQui Clardy, Sr.
Defendant:
The GEO Group, Inc., Iheanwichukwu Esochaghi, D.O., Jacqueline Brown, D.D.S. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCray v. USA
as 3:2024cv00047
Petitioner:
Marquis Devon McCray
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
RAMEY v. LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM DAVIS, JR. L.L.C.
as 2:2023cv05089
Plaintiff:
MARQUIS RAMEY
Defendant:
LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM DAVIS, JR. L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tate v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00437
Petitioner:
Marquis Valantee Tate
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pollard v. USA
as 3:2024cv00169
Petitioner:
Marquis Jerome Pollard
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
