Cases 21 - 30 of 273
DECKER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
ROBERT K. DECKER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, COLLETTE PETERS, SARA QURESHI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv20577
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Jusino v. Reis et al
as 3:2023cv00132
Plaintiff:
Jose A. Jusino
Defendant:
Jennifer Reis, Nick Rodrigues, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. City of Cleveland, et al
as 1:2022cv02313
Plaintiff:
Mark Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Cleveland, Officer Schut, Officer Rodrigues and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Rodrigues Bustos v. Rowe
as 5:2022ct03450
Plaintiff:
Rene Jhovany Rodrigues Bustos
Defendant:
Willy Rowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trotto v. Rodrigues
as 1:2022cv12058
Plaintiff:
Matteo Trotto
Respondent:
Michael Rodrigues
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonsalves v. Rodrigues
as 1:2022cv11994
Petitioner:
Antwan Gonsalves
Respondent:
Michael Rodrigues
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROBINSON v. LEAVINS et al
as 3:2022cv20805
Plaintiff:
CHARLES M ROBINSON
Defendant:
DONALD LEAVINS, BROWN, HUGHES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tolliver v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv00871
Plaintiff:
James L. Tolliver
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Asbelti Llorens Cordero, Mark Inch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patten v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 3:2022cv00809
Plaintiff:
Rodrigus Patten
Defendant:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
