Cases 21 - 30 of 82,326
DAVIS v. THOMPSON et al
as 1:2024cv09371
Respondent:
FCI FORT DIX and WARDEN THOMPSON
Petitioner:
KWAMAINE LAMONT DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dukes v. Forshey
as 5:2024cv01620
Respondent:
Warden Jay Forshey
Petitioner:
Eddie Dukes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hogan v. Black
as 1:2024cv01623
Defendant:
Warden Jennifer Black
Plaintiff:
Tremain Hogan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TASSONE v. VIA PATH TECHNOLOGIES et al
as 2:2024cv01335
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL, VIA PATH TECHNOLOGIES, GLOBAL TEL LINK and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA MICHAEL TASSONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Warden, FCI- Edgefield
as 2:2024cv05257
Petitioner:
Eduardo Martinez
Respondent:
Warden, FCI- Edgefield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ramirez v. Warden, FCI Big Spring
as 1:2024cv00155
Defendant:
Warden, FCI Big Spring
Petitioner:
Armando Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Curry-Wilson et al
as 1:2024cv00516
Petitioner:
Acting Warden Lefever and Shaneeka Lashaun Curry-Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Scott v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00518
Petitioner:
Rowena Joyce Scott
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Casillas v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00519
Respondent:
FCI Beckley Warden
Petitioner:
David Casillas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Scoggins v. Warden USP McCreary
as 6:2024cv00135
Respondent:
Warden USP McCreary
Petitioner:
David Michael Scoggins, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
