Cases 21 - 30 of 27,306
Huffman v. Baker
as 7:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Jullian Huffman
Defendant:
Judge Thomas W. Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STOCKTON et al v. LAUREL et al
as 1:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON, RYSHAWN CRAWFORD and THOMAS W. MCCUNE
Defendant:
HARRY LAUREL, GEORGE LITTLE, JOHN WETZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Barber v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Terry Lynn Barber
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Tate Reeves, Lynn Fitch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Horton v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00263
Petitioner:
Mandrell Horton
Respondent:
Warden W. Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
BELL v. WARDEN et al
as 2:2024cv06504
Petitioner:
KENT BELL
Respondent:
WARDEN, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, JUDGE FRANCIS A. MCGROGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Huffman v. Baker
as 7:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
Jullian Andrew Huffman
Defendant:
Judge Thomas W. Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gormley (PS) v. Khanzada et al
as 1:2024cv01534
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Gormley and Kathleen Mary Gormley
Defendant:
Abdul Khanzada, Brittany Khanzada, Tony and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VAUGHAN v. PURIFOY
as 3:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY W VAUGHAN
Defendant:
MIKESHIA PURIFOY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Le Clerc v. Waters et al
as 3:2024cv00525
Plaintiff:
Daniel Allen Le Clerc, Sr.
Defendant:
Sheriff T.K. Waters, M. Clark, W. Thomas, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown #246795 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv01226
Plaintiff:
Robbie W Brown, Sr.
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Sharon Joshua and Naphcare Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
