Cases 21 - 30 of 80,909
England v. Lovette et al
as 6:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Timothy E. England
Defendant:
Warden Lovette and John Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Civil Rights - Bivens Action
PERALTA-ROSARIO v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv07038
Petitioner:
DAVID PERALTA-ROSARIO
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
MARTINEZ POLANCO v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX et al
as 1:2024cv07005
Petitioner:
HILARIO MARTINEZ-POLANCO
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX and BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bridgewater v. Frederick
as 2:2024cv03224
Petitioner:
Dominique Bridgewater
Respondent:
Warden George Frederick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jimenez-Heyer v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2024cv00169
Petitioner:
Roberto Jimenez-Heyer
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Wallace v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2024cv00170
Petitioner:
Andre Lyneal Wallace
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bell v. Cueto
as 5:2024cv00679
Plaintiff:
Darren Bell
Defendant:
Head Warden Emundo Cueto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spencer v. Wheeler Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Jerry Wayne Spencer
Defendant:
Wheeler Correctional Facility, Medical Staff, Head Director and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
URBANO v. ACJ et al
as 2:2024cv00874
Petitioner:
MICHAEL J. URBANO
Respondent:
ACJ and ACTING WARDEN SHANE DADY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Baird v. Sharp et al
as 0:2024cv03549
Plaintiff:
Dewight Sheldon Baird
Defendant:
Warden Kenneth Sharp, Sergeant T. Session and John Doe 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
