Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Colburn v. Inmate Services Corporation 220 et al
as 2:2013cv00102
Plaintiff:
William Mark Colburn, Jr
Defendant:
Inmate Services Corporation 220 , Does, Greenwood Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan v. Director TDCJ
as 4:2013cv00586
Petitioner:
William Mark Sullivan
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Sullivan v. Director TDCJ
as 4:2013cv00335
Petitioner:
William Mark Sullivan
Respondent:
Director TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Isbell et al v. Ryan et al
as 2:2013cv00941
Plaintiff:
William Mark Isbell and Unknown Parties
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Hugh Matson, Jerry Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan v. Thaler
as 4:2013cv00135
Petitioner:
William Mark Sullivan
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sullivan v. Walker et al
as 4:2013cv00134
Petitioner:
William Mark Sullivan
Respondent:
David Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sullivan v. Thaler
as 4:2013cv00114
Petitioner:
William Mark Sullivan
Respondent:
David Walker and Wise County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sullivan et al v. Fostel et al
as 4:2012cv00579
Plaintiff:
William Mark Sullivan
Defendant:
John H Fostel, Barry S Green, Mike Carrillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cataldo v. USA
as 1:2012cv11025
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
William Mark Cataldo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
William Westmoreland v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 12-40366
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM MARK WESTMORELAND
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
