Cases 21 - 30 of 6,530
Woods v. Bossier Medium Correctional Center
as 5:2024cv00666
Plaintiff:
Herman Woods
Defendant:
Warden Bossier Medium Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WOODS v. WIZA
as 4:2024cv00071
Petitioner:
FABIAN WOODS, JR
Respondent:
Warden SCOTT WIZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wood
as 8:2024cv01194
Plaintiff:
Charity Noelle Wood
Defendant:
Jonathan Robert Hawkin, The State of Florida, Paul Showalter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Long et al v. LNU et al
as 1:2024cv00477
Plaintiff:
Antion M. Long, Jarred L Phillips, Shamar Singletary and others
Defendant:
FNU LNU, FNU Lucero, FNU Rosenbaucher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bynum v. Woods
as 4:2024cv00688
Petitioner:
Darryl R. Bynum
Respondent:
Ryan Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Chilton County Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Woods
Defendant:
Chilton County Jail, Ann Davis and Kathy Garrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huffman v. Woods et al
as 7:2024cv00312
Plaintiff:
Jullian Huffman
Defendant:
Woods, Osborne, S. Gullett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. State of Florida
as 8:2024cv01151
Plaintiff:
Charity Noelle Wood
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deegan v. Hutcheson et al
as 7:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Michael John Deegan
Defendant:
Bryan F. Hutcheson, Michelle Woods, Alicia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spirdione #947841 v. Wood
as 1:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Alan Spirdione #947841
Defendant:
Rebecca Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
