Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Click v. Lindamood
as 3:2015cv00474
Petitioner:
Steve Click
Respondent:
Cherry Lindamood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Charles Alexander Boyd v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2013cv01282
Defendant:
Absolute Fugitive Recovery Agency, Kristen Buie, Malinda Click and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Alexander Boyd
Click v. USA
as 1:2013cv16808
Petitioner:
Andrea Click
Defendant:
Myron L. Batts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
RESTRICTED - ACCEPT NO DOCUMENTS v. Sevier et al
as 3:2011cv00407
Plaintiff:
Kashmir La Juan Bray
Defendant:
Mark R Sevier, Clair Baines, Capt Truax and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Click v. USA
as 0:2011cv07183
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Andrea Click
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Click v. Cate
as 1:2009cv01418
Petitioner:
Windy Lynn Click and Windy Lynn Click
Respondent:
Matthew Cate and Tina Hornbeak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Click v. Cate
as 2:2009cv02159
Petitioner:
Windy Lynn Click
Respondent:
Matthew Cate and Tina Hornbeak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Terry Ward v. Larry Norris, et al
as 09-2668
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Terry Lee Ward
Defendant - Appellee:
Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Does, John and/or Jane, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC, Grant Harris, Warden, Varner Unit, ADC and others
Click v. Howard
as 6:2009cv00276
Petitioner:
James Lee Click
Respondent:
Bruce Howard and The Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
David Davenport v. Click Lockner, et al
as 09-2670
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID L. DAVENPORT
Defendant - Appellee:
CLICK LOCKNER, Counselor, TRACI WADDLE, Case Work Manager, HALEY LAWSON, Unit Team Manager and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
