Cases 31 - 40 of 1,819
Watkins v. Semmes et al
as 2:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Khristopher Watkins
Defendant:
Danny Semmes, Edwardo Mendoza, Clarence Cormier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mann v. Young et al
as 5:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Raymond William Mann
Defendant:
Michael Young, Jonathan Watkins and Bexar County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watkins v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lynn Watkins
Defendant:
Doe and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watkins v. Stenseth
as 0:2024cv00148
Petitioner:
Randall Watkins
Respondent:
Lisa Stenseth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WOODS v. JACKSON et al
as 4:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
FABIAN WOODS, JR
Defendant:
MARK JACKSON and JOCELYN WATKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mann v. Young et al
as 6:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Raymond William Mann
Defendant:
Michael Young, Jonathan Watkins and Bexar County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BURKS v. MCWILLIAMS et al
as 3:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
BRANDON JAMAAL BURKS
Defendant:
LASQUBIA MCWILLIAMS, DEBBIE JONES, KELLEY WATKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woody v. Taylor et al
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Woody
Defendant:
Keybo Taylor, Cleophas Atwater, J. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WATKINS v. REGALE et al
as 1:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN WATKINS
Defendant:
DENNIS REGALE, VERNON OSBURN, MERSHON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WOODY et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02315
Plaintiff:
BRANDON WOODY, ANTHONY WHITE, MARCO WEBSTER and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
