Cases 31 - 40 of 27,496
Cosby v. Banuelos, et al
as 24-1247
Petitioner:
GREGORY D. COSBY, AKA Gregory D. Crosby
Respondent:
M. BANUELOS, DHO Officer, A. CIOLLI, Warden, J. POTTER, Correctional Officer and others
WOODS v. JONES et al
as 5:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
LAMAR WOODS
Defendant:
DANIELLE K JONES and WILLIE R CORFT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fudge v. Jones et al
as 3:2024cv00919
Plaintiff:
James Charles Fudge
Defendant:
ODOC/Office-Pop-Mgr. Greg Jones, TRCI-Doc-Supt. T. Rumsey, TRCI-Doc-Supt. E. Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fudge v. Jones et al
as 2:2024cv00919
Plaintiff:
James Charles Fudge, Bubba Fudge and Bubba
Defendant:
ODOC/Office-Pop-Mgr. Greg Jones, TRCI-Doc-Supt. T. Rumsey, TRCI-Doc-Supt. E. Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCDOWELL v. BRITTAIN et al
as 2:2024cv02523
Petitioner:
DARIUS MCDOWELL
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT K. BRITTAIN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Dameia Smith
as 24-2020
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DAMEIA O. SMITH, a/k/a Omar, a/k/a D
Taylor a/k/a McCartney v. Arnott
as 6:2024cv03168
Petitioner:
Taylor a/k/a Nigel S McCartney
Respondent:
Jim Arnott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Targonsk et al
as 2:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
Timothy R. Smith
Defendant:
Targonsk, S. Herrick, G. Swartz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mueller v. Ybarra et al
as 3:2024cv00897
Plaintiff:
Christopher Mueller
Defendant:
J. Ybarra, C.O. Lay, K. Hofman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Celado v. Sorrell et al
as 9:2024cv00734
Plaintiff:
Jeurin Celado
Defendant:
K. Sorrell, Trim, T. Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
