Cases 31 - 40 of 8,748
(PC)Parker v. Sacramento et al
as 2:2024cv01195
Plaintiff:
Akika Parker
Defendant:
Sacramento, El Dorado Hills, Sacramento Sheriff Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ryan v. State of et al
as 4:2024cv11105
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Ryan
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, MDOC, G. Robert Cotton Correctional Facility and others
Hill v. Brigitte et al
as 4:2024cv02436
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon V. Hill
Defendant:
Brigitte, Yolanda and Kumar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cochran v. Matherly et al
as 4:2024cv04073
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Cochran
Defendant:
Martin Matherly, Tyler Garza and Hill Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Hill et al
as 3:2024cv00743
Petitioner:
Thomas Johnson
Respondent:
James Hill and R.J. Donovan Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SPENCER-HILL et al v. ACJF et al
as 1:2024cv05515
Plaintiff:
JASON T. SPENCER-HILL, ATEBA MAME HASSAN, NOBLE EL and others
Defendant:
ACJF, ACPS, DAVID KELSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Katz et al
as 1:2024cv03266
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Hill
Defendant:
Melinda Katz, Jacob Saks, Police Officer Crociata Stefano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Brown et al (INMATE 4)
as 3:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Quincy Tyrone Hill
Defendant:
Nona Adam Brown, Joseph Angelo, Paul Weatherly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPENCER-HILL v. KELSEY
as 1:2024cv05402
Petitioner:
JASON T. SPEUCER-HILL
Respondent:
DAVID KELSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hills v. Myers et al
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Lane Douglas Hills
Defendant:
Sheriff John Myers, Lt. Susan Taylor and Sgt. Dana Mobbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
