Cases 31 - 40 of 2,399
Norris v. Drischler
as 5:2024ct03010
Plaintiff:
Ricky Norris
Defendant:
K. Drischler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Middleton v. Chatham County et al
as 4:2023cv00356
Plaintiff:
Delano A. Middleton
Defendant:
Chatham County, Chief of Police of Savannah Police Department, Nickolas Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Rhodes v. Wyoming Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv00224
Defendant:
Wyoming Department of Corrections Director, Wyoming Department of Corrections, Daniel Shannon and others
Plaintiff:
Marty Wayne Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLDER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2023cv00524
Plaintiff:
NORRIS G. HOLDER, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and T.J. WATSON
Respondent:
STEVEN KALLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
NORRIS v. DRISCHLER
as 1:2023cv01063
Plaintiff:
RICKY NORRIS
Defendant:
K. DRISCHLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norris v. Stonebreaker
as 4:2023cv06165
Petitioner:
John Foster Norris
Respondent:
Warden Donnie Stonebreaker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Wesley Andrew Norris v. John Doe et al
as 2:2023cv10450
Plaintiff:
Wesley Andrew Norris
Defendant:
John Doe and Los Angeles County Sheriff Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01260
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Wilson (PS) v. Rollo et al
as 1:2023cv02555
Plaintiff:
Terance DeJuan Wilson
Defendant:
Rollo, BVCF Warden, Goins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Clay County Sheriff's Office et al
as 7:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Jace Smith
Defendant:
Clay County Sheriff's Office, District Attorney Casey Hall, Detective FNU Norris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
