Cases 31 - 40 of 1,203
Deronarte Norwood v. USA
as 23-1566
Petitioner / Appellant:
DERONARTE NORWOOD
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Norwood v. Wexford Health Service Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01457
Plaintiff:
Randy Norwood
Defendant:
Wexford Health Service Inc., Dr. West, Kim Czerniak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norwood v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv00147
Plaintiff:
Timothy Norwood
Defendant:
Susan Smith and Judge Mahan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ray v. Norwood
as 6:2023cv00067
Petitioner:
Eric S. Ray
Respondent:
Joseph Norwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Norwood v. Lauderdale County Jail et al
as 3:2023cv00093
Plaintiff:
Shamekia Latsha Norwood
Defendant:
Lauderdale County Jail, Meridian Police Department Jail, Unknown Bennett and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norwood v. Kane County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv00744
Plaintiff:
Randy Norwood
Defendant:
Kane County Jail, Kane County, Illinois, Ron Hain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hooks v. Blocker et al
as 6:2022cv00378
Plaintiff:
Antonio Dewayne Hooks
Defendant:
Blocker, Joe Norwood, Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McBroom v. Boyd et al
as 3:2022cv00318
Plaintiff:
Sahelian Deondrae McBroom
Defendant:
Marty Boyd, Calderone, Stanfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norwood v. Carter et al
as 3:2022cv02862
Plaintiff:
Ricky Norwood, Jr.
Defendant:
Clay Carter, Brian Carter, Troy Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norwood v. USA
as 3:2022cv01492
Petitioner:
Michael Norwood
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
