Cases 31 - 40 of 1,019
McCrae v. Jernigan et al
as 5:2024ct03023
Plaintiff:
Samuel McCrae, III
Defendant:
Unit Manager Jernigan, Unit Manager Patrella, Tamara Rush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYKINS v. SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION et al
as 1:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
RODERICK BOYKINS
Defendant:
SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, FNU LOCKLEAR, DEAN LOCKLEAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boykins v. Scotland Correctional Institution et al
as 3:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Roderick Boykins
Defendant:
Scotland Correctional Institution, FNU Locklear, Dean Locklear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rush v. Noonan et al
as 1:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Karan Terrell Rush
Defendant:
CO Patrick Noonan, Sgt Anderson, CO Juan Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gardner v. Doe
as 5:2023cv00117
Plaintiff:
Erik Flountez Gardner
Defendant:
John Doe, Luke Henderson, Steve Rushing and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Damond v. Rayville et al
as 3:2023cv01810
Plaintiff:
Glenn Damond
Defendant:
City of Rayville, Gary Gilley, Tyler Wade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rush v. Burton et al
as 4:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
Cody Allen Rush
Defendant:
Kendra Burton and Jammi Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rush v. Jenkins et al
as 4:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
Cody A. Rush
Defendant:
Brian Jenkins and Jim Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph Saari v. Jesse Pugh, Warden
as 23-3728
Petitioner:
Joseph Thomas Saari
Respondent:
Jesse Pugh, Warden of MCF--Rush City
Rush Holt, III v. Greensville Correctional Center
as 23-7295
Plaintiff:
RUSH JACK SAMUEL HOLT, III
Defendant:
GREENSVILLE CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
