Cases 31 - 40 of 334
(PC) Thorn v. Sac Jail
as 2:2023cv00069
Plaintiff:
Jason Thorn and Jayson Thorn
Defendant:
Sac Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welsh v. McLane et al
as 1:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Defendant:
Marsha McLane, Chris Greenwalt, Michael Searchy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THORNE v. HOWELL et al
as 1:2023cv00028
Petitioner:
LINWOOD DOUGLAS THORNE
Respondent:
BERYL A. HOWELL, GREGORY PAUL ROSEN and MANUEL WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hearn v. Ivey et al
as 6:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Thorne Deon Hearn
Defendant:
Wayne Ivey, Chief Singleton, Sergeant Hammers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Jacquez et al
as 1:2022cv08443
Plaintiff:
Yudi Diaz
Defendant:
Rikers Island Jacquez, Williams, Thorn and others
Interested Party:
Corporation Counsel of the City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thorne v. USA
as 4:2022cv01439
Petitioner:
Jason William Thorn
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Brooks v. Walmart Retailer Employees et al
as 2:2022cv04141
Plaintiff:
Kerry Brooks
Defendant:
Walmart Retailer Employees, Springfield Police Department, Justin Thorn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Davidson County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2022cv00572
Plaintiff:
DeVantia Davis
Defendant:
Davidson County Sheriff's Office, Anita Thorns and Chazsity Rooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boots v. Johnson et al
as 0:2022cv01894
Plaintiff:
Bill M. Boots
Defendant:
Nathan Johnson, Kevin Carlson, Richard O'Brien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
