Cases 31 - 40 of 203
Deberry v. Jividen et al
as 3:2021cv00051
Defendant:
Reggie Sellers, Andrew Ickler, Jeffery Wallace and others
Plaintiff:
David R. Deberry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walton v. Litherton et al
as 3:2021cv00123
Defendant:
Ms. Lacie Livingston, Dan Downen, Ms Lorie Cunningham and others
Plaintiff:
Romaris Walton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2021cv00082
Defendant:
Terry Grissom, J B Pritzker, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oryang v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00023
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Billy Mitchum, Dr. Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Bedogwar Oryang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez-Rivera v. Harper et al
as 1:2020cv02257
Defendant:
W. Dreibelbis, John Doe (2), John Doe (1) and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan A. Perez-Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LINTZ v. WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv00443
Defendant:
AMY WRIGHT, PEREZ and WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff:
DAKOTA LINTZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gauthier v. Hood et al
as 1:2020cv00413
Defendant:
Deidre Prevo, Travis Paul, Felecia Crawford and others
Plaintiff:
Brian S. Gauthier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Koenig v. Corizon Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv02224
Plaintiff:
Bruce W Koenig
Defendant:
Chidi Oriaku, H.S.A., Unnamed DPSCS Employees, Corizon Health, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Span v. Kordick et al
as 1:2020cv03563
Defendant:
Amanda Trantina, Shabbir Zacif, Megan M Martin and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Span
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peacock v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00401
Defendant:
Patrice Richie Jones, Lt. Clemmons, Nurse Practitioner Sanders and others
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Peacock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
