Cases 41 - 50 of 1,823
Grimes v. Vanihel et al
as 1:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
William R. Grimes
Defendant:
Frank Vanihel, Mrs. Cooper, Randy Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Isaac Brown v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10491
Petitioner:
ISAAC BROWN
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Carlson v. Burdick
as 1:2024cv00026
Petitioner:
Sergei Isaac Scott Carlson
Respondent:
Birch P. Burdick and Joseph Joyce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) James v. Dominisse et al
as 2:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
Ronald Eugene James
Defendant:
Pamela Jean Domimisse, Juan Corona, Isaac W. Choy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Woods and Demetrius L Woods
Defendant:
Doe, Gary Musslelwhite, Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Isaac Brown v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10405
Petitioner:
ISAAC BROWN
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
VANDERPOOL v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
DANIEL C. VANDERPOOL, JR.
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, MARK PAYNE, JAY HENDRIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes et al v. Chatham County Detention Center et al
as 4:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Keiron Kenneth Holmes, Sr., Micky Eugene Hamilton, Jed Allen Taylor and others
Defendant:
Chatham County Detention Center, John T. Wilcher, Chatham County Sheriff Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. City of Claremore et al
as 4:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Lance Martel Woods
Defendant:
City of Claremore, Claremore City Police Department, Stan Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
