Cases 41 - 50 of 4,237
Ericky Bogues v. Jeffery Nines
as 24-6285
Plaintiff:
ERICKY ARNEZZ BOGUES
Defendant:
WARDEN JEFFERY NINES and MEDICAL DOCTOR GETACHEW
Paul v. USA
as 2:2024cv02039
Petitioner:
Jeffery William Paul
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rose v. Darden et al
as 2:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
Derek Kent Rose
Defendant:
Tony Darden, Cris Desmond, Angela Hodges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOPKINS v. JEFFERY BURKETT et al
as 2:2024cv00469
Petitioner:
DANIEL KEITH HOPKINS
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, JASEN BOHINSKI, JEFFERY BURKETT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Paul v. USA
as 6:2024cv06041
Petitioner:
Jeffery William Paul
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Paul v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Western District of Arkansas)
as 6:2024cv06034
Petitioner:
Jeffery William Paul
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CHAVIS v. UNKNOWN PRISON OFFICIALS
as 1:2024cv00246
Petitioner:
JEFFERY CHAVIS
Respondent:
UNKNOWN PRISON OFFICIALS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavis v. Unnamed Defendant
as 5:2024ct03069
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Ryan Chavis
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pool v. Garcia
as 7:2024cv00036
Petitioner:
Jeffery Lamont Pool
Respondent:
Juan Garcia and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Covarrubias v. Crawford et al
as 2:2024cv00169
Petitioner:
Nicolas Salinas Covarrubias
Respondent:
Jeffery Crawford, Dept of Homeland security and I.C.E.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
