Cases 41 - 50 of 118
Allgood v. Curtis et al
as 4:2015cv02709
Petitioner:
Christopher Allgood
Respondent:
Stephanie Curtis, Jose Nava and Joyce Batson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKinney v. Plyler et al
as 6:2015cv06077
Plaintiff:
John Ross McKinney
Defendant:
Robbie Plyler, Robert McCallum, Brian Daniel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKinney v. Plyler, et al
as 6:2015cv06072
Plaintiff:
John Ross McKinney
Defendant:
Robbie Plyler, Becky Ussery, Robert McCallum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinney v. Plyler, et al
as 4:2015cv00428
Plaintiff:
John Ross McKinney
Defendant:
Robbie Plyler, Becky Ussery, Robert McCallum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Cagle et al
as 5:2015cv00697
Plaintiff:
Samuel Scott
Defendant:
Mike Cagle and FNU Batson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKinney v. Plyler et al
as 4:2015cv00375
Plaintiff:
John Ross McKinney
Defendant:
Robbie Plyler, Robert McCallum, Brian Daniel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffin v. Goodwin et al
as 5:2014cv02894
Plaintiff:
Christopher L Griffin
Defendant:
Jerry Goodwin, Anthony Batson, Angie Huff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul Weeks v. Dorchester County Detention
as 14-6752
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL WEEKS
Defendant - Appellee:
DORCHESTER COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, WARDEN SATTERFIELD, C.O. SCHUYLER and others
Rojas v. Dionne, et al
as 14-1396
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANKY ROJAS
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID DIONNE, Superintendent, Hillsborough County DOC, in his individual capacity, B. MARINEAU, Deputy Chief of Security, in his individual capacity, MARC CUSSON, Captain, in his individual capacity and others
Batson v. Southern Health Partners et al
as 2:2014cv00062
Plaintiff:
Quentin Lee Batson
Defendant:
Southern Health Partners, Habersham County Sheriff's Department and Habersham County Board of Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
