Cases 41 - 50 of 367
Gray v. Prince, et al
as 2:2017cv02346
Plaintiff:
DeAndrea Gray
Defendant:
United States of America, Charles Samuels, Edna Prince and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Larry Ray Ward v. US
as 17-6449
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY RAY WARD
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CHARLES SAMUELS, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BARNES, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JAMES and others
Jafari Moore v. U.S. Dept. Agriculture, et al
as 17-5363
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAFARI T. MOORE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, et al.
Defendant - Appellee:
E.M.T. CHRISTOPHER GRIFFIS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, M.D. JORGE VAZQUEZ-VELAZQUEZ and others
Staples v. USA et al
as 1:2017cv00328
Plaintiff:
William Staples
Defendant:
USA, Charles Samuel, Jr, Harrell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2017cv00030
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lee Woods
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Charles Samuels, Ian Connors and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Widi v. USA et al
as 1:2016fp00445
Defendant:
Mark Argir, Cory Balinas, B. Beegle and others
Plaintiff:
David J. Widi, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Johnson v. Teft et al
as 4:2016cv04109
Plaintiff:
Charles Samuel Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Corporal Teft, Officer Rodriguez, Corporal Hensley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beard v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2016cv01209
Plaintiff:
Lionel R Beard
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Charles Samuels, J. S. Walton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CHANDLER v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2016cv02141
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY RAY CHANDLER, SR.
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and CHARLES SAMUEL, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Miller v. Kernan
as 2:2016cv02534
Plaintiff:
Charles Samuel Miller
Defendant:
Scott Kernan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
