Cases 41 - 50 of 70
Thompson v. Winn Correctional Center
as 3:2014cv02505
Plaintiff:
Roland David Thompson
Defendant:
Warden Winn Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thompson v. Bentley, et al. (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00784
Plaintiff:
James David Thompson
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Tobias Thomas and Batina Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2014cv00191
Plaintiff:
DAVID THOMPSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and M. FARRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cogdell v. Elmira Police Department et al
as 1:2013cv00764
Plaintiff:
James E. Cogdell
Defendant:
Elmira Police Department, John Dunham, William Comstock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Patituce et al
as 1:2013cv01542
Plaintiff:
John David Thompson
Defendant:
Joseph C. Patituce and Catherine Meehan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Gelb
as 1:2013cv11764
Petitioner:
David Thompson
Respondent:
Bruce Gelb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dockery et al v. Epps, et al
as 3:2013cv00326
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Dockery , David Thompson , Jeffrey Covington and others
Defendant:
Christopher Epps , Gloria Perry and Archie Longley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montgomery v. Louisiana et al
as 2:2013cv00884
Plaintiff:
Kennith W Montgomery
Defendant:
State of Louisiana, City of Lake Charles, Calcasieu Parish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steven David Thompson v. M D Biter
as 5:2012cv01838
Respondent:
M D Biter
Petitioner:
Steven David Thompson, Sr
Harvey v. Harder
as 12-3840
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Gregory Harvey
Defendant:
William Lillie, Lieutenant
Defendant - Appellee:
David Harder, County Sheriff, Jon Gillette, Sergeant, Wesley Shear, Lieutenant and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
