Cases 41 - 50 of 3,272
Mason v. USA
as 3:2024cv00355
Petitioner:
Hugh Ellis Mason, III
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Sparks v. Cross County Jail et al
as 3:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Leonard Ellis Sparks
Defendant:
Cross County Jail, Arleen Clements, Does Cam, C. O., Cross County Jail; and Matt, C. O. Cross County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ELLIS v. COLLINS et al
as 1:2024cv00490
Plaintiff:
DEMAJIO JEROME ELLIS
Defendant:
TINA COLLINS, JOHN HEFLIN and DAVID GOBBER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ELLIS v. FONSECA et al
as 1:2024cv00515
Plaintiff:
DEMAJIO JEROME ELLIS
Defendant:
FONSECA, CHAD EVANS, JACK HENDRIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brady Spicer v. Wilkes County North Carolina
as 24-6309
Plaintiff:
BRADY LEON SPICER
Defendant:
JONATHAN CALL, Lieutenant, ROBERT CLAYTON ANDERSON, DEREK ELLIS, Parole Office and others
(PC) Ellis v. El Dorado County Probation Dept.
as 2:2024cv01302
Plaintiff:
Peter Ellis
Defendant:
El Dorado County Probation Department and El Dorado County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURZIKE v. ELLIS et al
as 3:2024cv00197
Defendant:
JAMES T. MURZIKE, D ELLIS, T THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demajio Ellis v. Linda Carper, et al
as 24-1755
Plaintiff:
DEMAJIO J. ELLIS
Defendant:
LINDA CARPER, JOHNATHAN JACKSON, Sergeant, BRIAN MARTZ and others
Phillips v. Governor Kay Ivey et al
as 1:2024cv00551
Plaintiff:
Matthew Sherman Phillips
Defendant:
Governor Kay Ivey, John Hamm, Steven Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURZIKE v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
R QUINN, W GIELOW, J SANTIAGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
