Cases 41 - 50 of 7,563
Jacksonbey v. Warden, FCC Coleman II
as 5:2024cv00419
Defendant:
Warden, FCC Coleman II
Petitioner:
Haneef Shakeel Jacksonbey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lewis v. Osmundson et al
as 4:2024cv04151
Defendant:
Jane Doe, . Ruel, Jane Doe, II and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacksonbey v. Warden, FCC Coleman II
as 5:2024cv00409
Petitioner:
Haneef Shakeel Jacksonbey
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Donmon v. Jackson
as 3:2024cv05647
Petitioner:
Simeon N Donmon, II
Respondent:
Rob Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
BOULIER v. PENOBSCOT COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2024cv00284
Respondent:
PENOBSCOT COUNTY JAIL
Petitioner:
WAYNE E BOULIER, II
Unknown:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - HABEAS CASES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TUPAK BEY v. CALLAWAY et al
as 1:2024cv01362
Plaintiff:
CALIFIA HATUN TUPAK BEY, II
Defendant:
STEPHANIE CALLAWAY and MIDWEST FORENSIC SERVICES, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kemplin v. Townsely
as 2:2024cv11994
Defendant:
Townsely
Plaintiff:
Edward Kemplin, II
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Davis v. USA
as 3:2024cv00714
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Richard Anthony Davis, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Fusilier, II v. McBride et al
as 1:2024cv00311
Defendant:
D Morris, Michael McBride and Jefferson County Correctional Facility
Plaintiff:
Gregory Charles Fusilier, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Villar v. Wiliams
as 2:2024cv00972
Respondent:
Warden Louis Wiliams, II
Petitioner:
Yonathan Leandro Villar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
