Cases 41 - 50 of 311
McNair v. State of Maryland
as 1:2022cv01196
Plaintiff:
Jimmie McNair
Defendant:
State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
McNair v. Melbourne Police Department et al
as 6:2022cv00807
Plaintiff:
Michael D. McNair
Defendant:
Melbourne Police Department, Christopher Clayton and Luke Dummer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNair v. Gross et al
as 4:2022cv00153
Plaintiff:
Tate Miller McNair
Defendant:
Nikki Gross, Katie Overbie and Beatric Barbosa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNair v. Divris
as 4:2022cv40017
Petitioner:
Dwayne McNair
Respondent:
Matthew Divris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McNair v. Brown
as 1:2022cv00077
Plaintiff:
Evan Lee McNair
Defendant:
Wendy Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carlisle v. McNair
as 22-30031
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Taylor Carlisle, Individually and as Representative Member of a Class and Emile Heron, individually and as Representative Member of a Class
Defendant / Appellee:
Joe McNair, Director of Counseling of the 24th JDC Drug Court Intensive Probation Program, also known as Joseph Thomas McNair, Newell Normand, Sheriff and Administrator of the Jefferson Parish Correctional Center, McNair & McNair, L.L.C. and others
Appellee:
Sheriff Joseph P. Lopinto, III
McNair v. Glazer
as 1:2021cv24422
Plaintiff:
Frank McNair
Defendant:
Mandy Glazer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McNair v. Brown
as 7:2021cv00616
Plaintiff:
Evan Lee McNair
Defendant:
Wendy Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNair v. USA
as 7:2021cv00208
Petitioner:
Bobby Preston McNair
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
McNair v. Precythe et al
as 5:2021cv06128
Plaintiff:
Daryll McNair
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Ryan Brownlow, A Stufflebean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
