Cases 41 - 50 of 245
(PC) Hammler v. Zydus Pharmacy et al
as 1:2021cv00343
Defendant:
M. A. Martinez, Brian Elledge, Raphael Barba and others
Plaintiff:
Allen Hammler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tuduj v. Menard Pharmacist et al
as 3:2020cv01273
Defendant:
Boswell Pharmacy Services LLC, Donald R. Unwin, T. Bradley and others
Plaintiff:
Tom Tuduj
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tuduj v. Menard Pharmacist et al
as 4:2020cv04245
Defendant:
. Siddiqqui, Boswell Pharmacy Services LLC, T Bradley and others
Plaintiff:
Tom Tuduj
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
May v. John/ Jane Doe Pharmacy et al
as 2:2020cv01688
Defendant:
Health Services Unit Manager, John/ Jane Doe Pharmacy, John/ Jane Doe Health Services Unit and others
Plaintiff:
Edith Mae May
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bobbitt v. Zantac, Sanofi Pharma, Co. et al
as 3:2020cv50436
Defendant:
Boswell Pharmacy Services, Illinois Department of Corrections, Walgreens Pharmacy Services and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Bobbitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cargill v. CMC Pharmacy et al
as 4:2020cv03605
Defendant:
CMC Pharmacy, Betty Williams, Mark A Barber and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Clint Cargill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pinder v. WellPath et al
as 2:2020cv00201
Defendant:
WellPath, Robert Floss, Tracy Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Pinder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plummer v. Adesanya et al
as 3:2020cv00950
Defendant:
T. Adesanya, Jane/John Doe 1, Marsha Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Contrell Plummer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greer v. Jones et al
as 3:2020cv00794
Plaintiff:
James Greer
Defendant:
Ernest Joseph Jones and Clinical Service Pharmacy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bridgeford v. Moultrie et al
as 8:2020cv02691
Defendant:
Dr. Moultrie, M. Peters and Pharmacy Tech Ike
Plaintiff:
Douglass Bridgeford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
