Cases 41 - 50 of 538
Miller v. Downs et al
as 3:2022cv00728
Plaintiff:
Alex W. Miller
Defendant:
f/n/u Downs, Rutherford County Adult Detention Center, Mike Fitchugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rutherford v. Ward et al
as 4:2022cv00199
Plaintiff:
Barry L. Rutherford
Defendant:
Timothy Ward, Joshua Jones, Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laster v. Boyle et al
as 3:2022cv01913
Plaintiff:
Shermaine Laster
Defendant:
Jane Boyle, Judge Renee Harris Toliver, Rebecca Rutherford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cannady v. Polk County Jail et al
as 1:2022cv00163
Plaintiff:
Lamar Cannady
Defendant:
Polk County Jail, Rutherford County SBI, Polk County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Degoto v. Larry Hogan
as 22-6944
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL PATRICK DEGOTO
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBIN WOOLFORD, WILLIAM BOHRER, Warden, OFFICER T. LEACH and others
USA v. Antonio Rutherford
as 22-2489
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTONIO RUTHERFORD
Rutherford v. USA
as 2:2022cv00013
Petitioner:
Joshua Lee Rutherford
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Bennett v. Bedford County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2022cv00586
Plaintiff:
Matthew David Bennett
Defendant:
Bedford County, Tennessee, Chad Graham, State of Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv00448
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ellis v. Rutherford et al
as 2:2022cv00747
Plaintiff:
Jimmie L Ellis
Defendant:
Christine Rutherford and City of Milwaukee Police Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
