Cases 41 - 50 of 110
Byrd et al v. Stirling et al
as 6:2015cv03152
Plaintiff:
Calvin J Byrd, Joseph Priester, James Benson and others
Defendant:
Bryan Stirling, Neana Staley and Mr Maples
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arnold Jeffrey Sayles v. Terry O'Brien
as 15-7247
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARNOLD JEFFREY SAYLES
Defendant - Appellee:
MR. TERRY O'BRIEN, Warden, MR. T. BAYLESS, Correctional Officer and MR. R. SHANNON, Correctional Officer
Harris #176396 v. Justaniano Tan et al
as 1:2015cv00630
Plaintiff:
Frederick J. Harris #176396, Jr.
Defendant:
Nora Justaniano Tan, Greenridge Realty Co., US Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAYLES v. ZATECKY
as 1:2015cv00463
Petitioner:
RICHARD N. SAYLES
Respondent:
DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duncan v. The State of Texas et al
as 3:2015cv00711
Plaintiff:
Logan Colin Duncan
Defendant:
The State of Texas, Johnson County Court, Walker/Sayle Correction Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAYLES v. ZATECKY
as 1:2015cv00189
Petitioner:
RICHARD N. SAYLES
Respondent:
DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SAYLES v. ZATECKY
as 1:2015cv00114
Petitioner:
RICHARD N. SAYLES
Respondent:
DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Letourneau v. Aul et al
as 1:2014cv00421
Plaintiff:
Devon Letourneau
Defendant:
Linda Aul, Billy Bogoanes, Lieutenant Sayles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Forbes v. Wall et al
as 1:2014cv00322
Defendant:
Ashbel T. Wall, Alfred Leach, Lt. William Galligan and others
Plaintiff:
Darcy Forbes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Greene v. Wall et al
as 1:2014cv00279
Plaintiff:
Donnell Greene
Defendant:
Ashbel T. Wall, Adams, Matthew Kettle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
