Cases 41 - 50 of 594
Swaim v. Shannan et al
as 4:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
Toby Lee Swaim
Defendant:
Michael Shannan, Mickey Noble, Katie Yackle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Vallejos v. State of New Mexico et al
as 2:2023cv00008
Petitioner:
Toby Vallejos
Respondent:
State of New Mexico, Hector Rios and Raul Torres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Antoine v. Terrell
as 2:2022cv06204
Plaintiff:
Toby Lee Antoine
Defendant:
Terry Terrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kittrell v. Darnell et al
as 9:2022cv00196
Plaintiff:
Toby Kittrell
Defendant:
Kate Darnell, Tara Kattell, Ryan Mickelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WEBSTER v. CARTER JR et al
as 1:2022cv02416
Plaintiff:
TOBY L. WEBSTER
Defendant:
ROBERT E CARTER JR, DAUSS, INDIANA DEPT CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WEBSTER v. CARTER JR. et al
as 1:2022cv02374
Plaintiff:
TOBY L. WEBSTER
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER JR., DAUSS, DENNIS REAGAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Godfrey et al v. City Of Joliet et al
as 1:2022cv06708
Plaintiff:
Toby Godfrey
Defendant:
City Of Joliet, Lukasz Gal, Adam Rosales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Person v. Wilstin et al
as 3:2022cv05907
Plaintiff:
Anthony Shrone Person
Defendant:
Nichole E Wilstin, Daniel Patton, Summit Law Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Antoine v. Cooley
as 22-30711
Petitioner / Appellant:
Toby Lee Antoine
Respondent / Appellee:
Keith Cooley, Warden, Allen Correctional Center
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
