Cases 41 - 50 of 74
AIGBEKAEN v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2019cv22115
Respondent:
MS. RIVERA, AW SMITH, SOLICITOR GENERAL and others
Petitioner:
RAYMOND AIGBEKAEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jones v. BOP Director, The et al
as 1:2019cv00553
Plaintiff:
William Jones and William Lee Jones
Defendant:
BOP Director, The, Pollock USP, McCreary USP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. BOP Director, The et al
as 1:2019cv02118
Plaintiff:
William Jones and William Lee Jones
Defendant:
Beaumont USP, Pollock USP, McCreary USP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nigel Nicholas Douglas v. BOP Director et al
as 5:2019cv01015
Defendant:
Melix, Unknown Others, Villanueva and others
Plaintiff:
Nigel Nicholas Douglas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas v. BOP Director et al
as 3:2019cv00822
Defendant:
Melix, Unknown Others, Villanueva and others
Plaintiff:
Nigel Nicholas Douglas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
McCollum v. U. S. Attorney General, et al
as 1:2018cv00199
Plaintiff:
Jessie McCollum
Defendant:
U. S. Attorney General, BOP Director, Regional Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larry Cochran v. Mark Inch, et al
as 18-1744
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY COCHRAN
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK S. INCH, BOP Director, JOHN DOES, Joint Policy Committee Members, STEVE KALLIS, Warden, Warden FCI Pekin and others
Maxton v. Trump et al
as 5:2017cv00475
Plaintiff:
Theron Johnny Maxton
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, U.S. Attorney General, BOP Director and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Marcus Wright v. J. Shartle, et al
as 16-17033
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARCUS DESHAWN WRIGHT
Respondent - Appellee:
J. T. SHARTLE, MARY M. MITCHELL, Regional Director of Tucson USP and CHARLES E. SAMUELS, BOP Director
Maxton v. United States, et al
as 16-1441
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THERON JOHNNY MAXTON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BOP DIRECTOR, WASHINGTON, D.C., T.K. COZZA-RHODES, Warden, F.C.I. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
