Cases 41 - 50 of 178
Crawford v. Cuomo
as 16-3466
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Crawford and Thaddeus Corley
Defendant - Appellee:
Andrew Cuomo, Governor of the State of New York, Brian Fischer, Comissioner of Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, William P. Brown, Superintendent and others
Defendant:
John Doe, Corrections Officers 1-8
Brown v. Mansukhani
as 9:2016cv03079
Petitioner:
William Benjamin Brown
Respondent:
Warden Mansukhani
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Brown v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2016cv02393
Petitioner:
William David Brown
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hyman v. Brown
as 16-2723
Petitioner - Appellee:
Tullie Hyman
Respondent - Appellant:
William D. Brown, Superintendent
Brown v. United States of America
as 6:2016cv00081
Petitioner:
William Benjamin Brown
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
William Brown, II v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 16-12680
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM P. BROWN, II
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Michael Lane v. Gaye Karriker, et al
as 16-40400
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL LANE
Defendant - Appellee:
GAYE L. KARRIKER, SHAUNA VESTAL, WILLIAM D. BROWN and others
Brown v. Iosacco et al
as 3:2016cv00603
Plaintiff:
William E. Brown, Jr.
Defendant:
C. E. Ducart, R. Amis, J. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. GARMON et al
as 2:2016cv00063
Petitioner:
WILLIAM LEE BROWN
Respondent:
GARMON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lane v. Karriker et al
as 6:2015cv01149
Plaintiff:
Michael Lane
Defendant:
Gaye L Karriker, Shauna Vestal, William D Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
