Cases 51 - 60 of 690
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-10367
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tilahun v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Shua Tilahun
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Sgt. Bernhardt, Cory Furey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. Kidd, et al.
as 3:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Ja'Kai Simmons
Defendant:
LT. Kidd, Captain Lucy, Major Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thacker v. Virginia Dep't of Corrections et al
as 7:2022cv00707
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Thacker and Matthew L. Thacker
Defendant:
Virginia Dep't of Corrections, Harold W. Clarke, B. Morton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newell v. Tate et al
as 5:2022cv00277
Plaintiff:
Leroy Lee Newell, Jr.
Defendant:
DiDymus Tate, Prime Care Health Service, Lt. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Windham v. Pike et al
as 2:2022cv02007
Plaintiff:
Charles Windham
Defendant:
Michael Pike, Matthew Swett, Donald Mathews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Windham v. Covello et al
as 2:2022cv01931
Plaintiff:
Charles Windham
Defendant:
Patrick Covello, Bryan Holmes, Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Booth v. Sampson
as 1:2022cv04350
Plaintiff:
Delroy T. Booth
Defendant:
Warden Sampson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00565
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Booth v. State of New York et al
as 9:2022cv01010
Plaintiff:
Patrick M. Booth
Defendant:
State of New York, A. Poalano and Letisha James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
