Cases 51 - 60 of 47,575
Seats v. Meathaney et al
as 3:2024cv02175
Defendant:
Lt Sulger, Nurse Lewis, Sgt Meathaney and others
Plaintiff:
Devin Seats
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crabb v. Donathan et al
as 4:2024cv04169
Defendant:
Paula Lodge, . Parsons, Shan Jumper and others
Plaintiff:
Steven C Crabb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SUMMERS v. FOSTER et al
as 1:2024cv01615
Plaintiff:
ROBERT C. SUMMERS, III
Defendant:
JACKSON, FOSTER, COOPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. USA
as 4:2024cv00616
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Troy C Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gomez v. Crossroads Correction Center et al
as 4:2024cv00084
Defendant:
Core Civic, Crossroads Correction Center and Shelby, Prison C/O Aaron Infanger
Plaintiff:
Mario Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lefleur v. Otero County Detention Center
as 2:2024cv00921
Defendant:
Otero County Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Shaun C. Lefleur
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jaime v. Martuscello et al
as 9:2024cv01114
Defendant:
Daniel F. Martuscello, III, C. Witty-Lewis, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Luis Jaime
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calhoun v. Dabney et al
as 1:2024cv00872
Defendant:
The City Of Buffalo, New York, Phillip Dabney, Jr., Jospeh Pazkiewicz and others
Plaintiff:
Dominique C. Calhoun
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPRAUVE v. UNKNOWN OFFICIAL AT DURHAM COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
as 1:2024cv00769
Defendant:
UNKNOWN OFFICIAL AT DURHAM COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Plaintiff:
JON C. SPRAUVE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00683
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
C. Wayne Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
