Cases 51 - 60 of 2,047
Caldwell v. Turner et al
as 5:2023cv04054
Interested Party:
Robert Thole
Plaintiff:
Rocky Joe Caldwell
Defendant:
Cory Turner, Everett Fowler, Jared Rapp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ACOSTA v. CALDWELL CORRECTIONAL CTR.
as 1:2023cv00750
Petitioner:
JESSE FRANCISCO ACOSTA
Respondent:
CALDWELL CORRECTIONAL CTR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lamonte, Jr. v. Pierce et al
as 1:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
Charlie Lamonte McKinney, Jr. and Al-Kareem-Khalil
Defendant:
Special Agent Matthew Pierce, G.D.C. Criminal Investigation Division, G.D.C. Office of Professional Standards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caldwell v. Smith et al
as 5:2023cv06097
Plaintiff:
Prince Bossalinie and Nathan Caldwell
Defendant:
Rich Smith, Beverly Baker and Jessica Ballinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. CALDWELL et al
as 5:2023cv00280
Plaintiff:
JAMES KINSLEY ANDERSON
Defendant:
ANTONIE CALDWELL and GA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Wexford Health Sources Inc et al
as 1:2023cv01284
Plaintiff:
Rodney Williams
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc, Alberto Butalid, Vipin Shah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caldwell v. TDC Employees
as 23-40448
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert Franklin Caldwell
Defendant / Appellee:
TDC Employees
Levi Challenger v. Gisella Bassolino, et al
as 23-2339
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEVI CHALLENGER
Defendant / Appellee:
GISELLA BASSOLINO, BILL UHLER, NICHOLAS ISOLANO and others
HUGHES v. CALDWELL et al
as 5:2023cv00269
Plaintiff:
HARLINGTON HUGHES
Defendant:
ANTIONE CALDWELL and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caldwell v. Moore et al
as 2:2023cv11784
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Caldwell
Defendant:
John Moore and Ologunsola
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
