Cases 51 - 60 of 620
Fluker v. Dunn
as 2:2023cv10617
Plaintiff:
Antonio Lynn Fluker, Jr
Defendant:
Bryan Dunn, J. Hule, Colsan and others
Ruggiero v. Rogers et al
as 1:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ruggiero
Defendant:
Donald D. Rogers, Mark E. Carrow, Joseph H. Noeth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spratley v. Williams
as 2:2023cv00093
Plaintiff:
Matthew Spratley
Defendant:
Lt. D. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Madison Parish et al
as 3:2023cv00250
Plaintiff:
Timothy D Williams
Defendant:
Sheriff of Madison Parish, Warden Brooks, Officer Byron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv00714
Petitioner:
James D. Williams
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 0:2023cv60226
Plaintiff:
Oliver D. Williams
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Scarantino
as 5:2023hc02029
Petitioner:
Frederick D. Williams
Respondent:
Warden T. Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Montgomery v. Waterloo Police Department et al
as 6:2023cv02009
Plaintiff:
Tavares Montgomery and Tavares D Williams
Defendant:
Waterloo Police Department, Marcus Harrington, Admir Babic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Carroll et al v. CDCR et al
as 1:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Tremayne Carroll, Latasha Brown, Tiffany Tooks and others
Defendant:
CDCR, Kathleen Allison and Parralles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Williams et al
as 1:2022cv01020
Plaintiff:
Victor Rodriguez
Defendant:
M.D. David D. Williams, Concetta M. Partrige and Kay G. Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
