Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 8,799
Felix Jones-Hill v. Catherine Bauman
as 24-1444
Petitioner: FELIX JONES-HILL
Respondent: CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden
William Hill v. United States
as 24-2023
Petitioner: William Thomas Hill
Respondent: United States of America
Hill v. State of Nevada et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00923
Plaintiff: JoAquin Hill
Defendant: State of Nevada, Nevada Department of Corrections, Ely State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Arkansas Department of Corrections We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00441
Plaintiff: Ethan C Hill
Defendant: Arkansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Warner et al
as 4:2024cv04045
Plaintiff: Aaron Hill
Defendant: Correctional Officer Otto Warner and Correctional Officer Paige Betts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Calhoun
as 3:2024cv00267
Plaintiff: Cedric Hill
Defendant: Ward Calhoun
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
HILL v. ISHEE
as 1:2024cv00413
Petitioner: SIMARON D. HILL
Respondent: TODD ISHEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wayne Davis v. Superintendent Camp Hill SCI, et al
as 24-1858
Plaintiff: WAYNE A. DAVIS
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT CAMP HILL SCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY BLAIR COUNTY
Davison v. Smith et al
as 5:2024cv00483
Plaintiff: Alonzo Gabriel Davison
Defendant: Clifford J Smith, Scott Rowland, Robert L Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodgers v. Hill et al
as 3:2024cv00837
Petitioner: Milton Melvin Rodgers
Respondent: J. Hill and The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?