Cases 51 - 60 of 19,338
Fusilier v. Singletary et al
as 1:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Gregory Fusilier
Defendant:
James P Singletary, Roy West, Zena Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. NEEL et al
as 3:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
SHAQUON R JOHNSON
Defendant:
J NEEL, E MANNERS, S GREENE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grice v. Dawson et al
as 8:2024cv01361
Plaintiff:
Chad L. Grice
Defendant:
Warden Jacob Dawson, Assistant Warden B. Walden, Assistant Warden P. Catalano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAKER v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv05517
Petitioner:
JONATHAN P. BAKER
Respondent:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
ALLEN v. TUNEY et al
as 1:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
LESLIE DEWAYNE ALLEN
Defendant:
GARY P. TUNEY and ADRIANNE S. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James P. Rodriguez v. Los Angeles Sheriffs Dept.
as 2:2024cv04492
Plaintiff:
James P. Rodriguez
Defendant:
Los Angeles Sheriffs Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gee #792888 v. Washington et al
as 2:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
TyJuan Gee #792888
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, P. Hubble, Unknown Naeyart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrell v. Gaughan
as 3:2024cv01432
Plaintiff:
Quinyatte J. Harrell
Defendant:
James P. Gaughan, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marion Chapman v. Clay Stanton, et al
as 24-2132
Plaintiff:
Marion M. Chapman
Defendant:
Clay Stanton, Warden, Department of Corrections, G. Fife, Records Officer, Brittany Tischer, P&P and others
Alan v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2024cv00953
Plaintiff:
David P. Alan
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden, FCI Elkton, Warden, FCI Loretto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
