Cases 51 - 60 of 227
Wright v. Logan et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2020cv00878
Defendant:
Officer Messer, Officer Osburn, Officer Logan and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan L. Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonilla v. Clay et al
as 4:2020cv07561
Defendant:
Tara Desautels, Nora Becerra, Catherine Kobal and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
House v. St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department, District 4 et al
as 4:2020cv01539
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department, District 4 and Kimberly M. Gardner
Plaintiff:
Shay House
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHAY v. RANGOS et al
as 2:2020cv01518
Defendant:
COUNTY OF GREENE, SOLICITOR GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, JUDGE JILL E. RANGOS and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN R. SHAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SHAY v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2020cv01447
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL ZAKEN
Petitioner:
KEVIN R. SHAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Phillips v. Johnson et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00579
Defendant:
Sgt. Johnson, Lt. Johnson, Nurse Dyher and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Cornelius Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Johnson et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2020cv00579
Defendant:
Sgt. Johnson, Lt. Johnson, Nurse Dyher and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Cornelius Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLACK v. HATCHER
as 4:2020cv00177
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Respondent:
Shay Hatcher
Petitioner:
JEROME W BLACK, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BLACK v. HATCHER
as 4:2020cv00163
Respondent:
Warden SHAY HATCHER
Petitioner:
JEROME W BLACK, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Anthony v. HATCHER
as 1:2020cv00124
Petitioner:
Danny Lorenzo Anthony
Defendant:
Warden SHAY HATCHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
