Cases 51 - 60 of 61
DAVIS v. BEARD
as 2:2008cv01724
Petitioner:
THOMAS DAVIS
Respondent:
JEFFREY A. BEARD
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Davis v. Rowley et al
as 8:2008cv03453
Petitioner:
Thomas Davis
Respondent:
John Rowley and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Thomas Davis v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 08-2805
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS DAVIS
Defendant:
JEFFREY BEARD, Ssecretary of Corrections and ATTY GEN PA
DAVIS v. BEARD et al
as 2:2008cv00441
Petitioner:
THOMAS DAVIS
Respondent:
JEFFREY A. BEARD and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. State of California
as 2:2008cv00239
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Thomas Davis
Respondent:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jeffrey Thomas Davis v. The State of California
as 2:2007cv05587
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Thomas Davis
Respondent:
The State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Booker
as 2:2007cv12564
Petitioner:
Thomas Davis
Respondent:
Raymond Booker
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Hall v. Atty Gen of Texas, et al
as 07-40157
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DESHAWN HALL
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS, MITCH WOOD, Chief of Police and THOMAS DAVIS, in His Official Capacity as Director of Texas Department of Public Safety
Davis v. West Point Police Department et al
as 1:2006cv00282
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas Davis
Defendant:
West Point Police Department, Bobby Lane and Zate McGee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Francis
as 1:2007cv00005
Plaintiff:
Thomas Davis
Defendant:
Joyce Francis and Joyce Francis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
