Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 5,062
Morris v. Director of Corrections et al
as 4:2024cv00372
Plaintiff: Shiloh M. Morris
Defendant: Director of Corrections and Entire Nursing Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Radford v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv00014
Plaintiff: Tommy L Radford
Defendant: Smith and Q Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRATHER v. LITHERHAND et al
as 2:2024cv00031
Plaintiff: REGINALD J. PRATHER
Defendant: R. LITHERHAND, N. MORRIS and LITTLE JOHN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Clary et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv01006
Plaintiff: Timothy David Williams
Defendant: Shena Clary and Vernnon Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morales v. Charlotte Correctional Institution et al
as 2:2024cv00108
Plaintiff: Eddie N. Morales
Defendant: Charlotte Correctional Institution, Officer Wylock and Ms. Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monica Morris v. Does
as 24-1100
Plaintiff: Monica Morris
Defendant: Does
Michael Morris v. United States
as 24-1078
Plaintiff: Michael Morris
Defendant: United States of America
Chapman v. Allen et al
as 1:2024cv01042
Plaintiff: Billie Joe Chapman
Defendant: Donald Allen, FNU Boyd, Joshua Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Collins v. J. Oats
as 24-6126
Plaintiff: MICHAEL LASHARN COLLINS
Defendant: J. D. OATS, Assistant Warden, C. WASHINGTON, Inmate Program Manager and BERNARD MORRIS, Religious Advisor to the Faith Review Committee for Virginia DOC
ALEXANDER v. HOUSER et al
as 2:2024cv00391
Petitioner: TYRONE ALEXANDER and TYRONE S. ALEXANDER
Respondent: MARTIN HOUSER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?