Cases 61 - 70 of 1,480
Galarza v. Taylor
as 5:2023ct03197
Plaintiff:
Randolph Galarza
Defendant:
Thomas G. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clay v. L. Lores, et al
as 1:2023cv01611
Plaintiff:
Carleous Clay
Defendant:
Central Office, L. Lores, Mrs. Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly (ID 61483) v. Schnurr et al
as 5:2023cv03142
Plaintiff:
Terrance J. Kelly
Defendant:
Dan Schnurr, Fred C. Early, John C. Cannon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randolph v. Buckner
as 4:2023cv00369
Petitioner:
Joshua Randolph
Respondent:
Michele Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crump v. Mississippi Attorney General et al
as 3:2023cv00204
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Crump
Defendant:
Mississippi Attorney General, John W. Champion, Steven Patrick Jubera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-6506
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
RANDOLPH v. MOORE et al
as 2:2023cv00796
Plaintiff:
BRIAN RANDOLPH
Defendant:
JUSTIN MOORE, LARRY BOGGS, ERIC HAAG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Powell v. Lynch et al.
as 2:2023cv00875
Plaintiff:
Adam Randolph Powell
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch, Moirara and Lively
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby et al v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02298
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby, Robert L. Love, Jerrahmiah J. Rankins and others
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02276
Plaintiff:
Quinterrion Gray
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
